How do we know radiometric dating is reliable Online sexy chat with aout ragestration
Part 2 explains how scientists run into problems when they make assumptions about what happened .
An hourglass is a helpful analogy to explain how geologists calculate the ages of rocks.
To date a radioactive rock, geologists first measure the “sand grains” in the top glass bowl (the parent radioisotope, such as uranium-238 or potassium-40).
Furthermore, they have not been able to significantly change these decay rates by heat, pressure, or electrical and magnetic fields.
These basalts yield ages of up to 1 million years based on the amounts of potassium and argon isotopes in the rocks.
But when we date the rocks using the rubidium and strontium isotopes, we get an age of 1.143 billion years.
For example, with regard to the volcanic lavas that erupted, flowed, and cooled to form rocks in the unobserved past, evolutionary geologists simply assume that none of the daughter argon-40 atoms was in the lava rocks.
For the other radioactive “clocks,” it is assumed that by analyzing multiple samples of a rock body, or unit, today it is possible to determine how much of the daughter isotopes (lead, strontium, or neodymium) were present when the rock formed (via the so-called isochron technique, which is still based on unproven assumptions 2 and 3).